Recently, high resolution images of the simultaneous representation of orientation preference, orientation selectivity and ocular dominance have been obtained for large areas in monkey striate cortex by optical imaging [1-3]. These data allow for the first time a "local" as well as "global" description of the spatial patterns and provide strong evidence for corre(cid:173) lations between orientation selectivity and ocular dominance. A quantitative analysis reveals that these correlations arise when a five(cid:173) dimensional feature space (two dimensions for retinotopic space, one each for orientation preference, orientation specificity, and ocular dominance) is mapped into the two available dimensions of cortex while locally preserving topology. These results provide strong evidence for the concept of topology preserving maps which have been suggested as a basic design principle of striate cortex [4-7]. Monkey striate cortex contains a retinotopic map in which are embedded the highly repetitive patterns of orientation selectivity and ocular dominance.

A neural network model for the self-organization of ocular dominance and lateral connections from binocular input is presented. The self-organizing process results in a network where (1) afferent weights of each neuron or(cid:173) ganize into smooth hill-shaped receptive fields primarily on one of the reti(cid:173) nas, (2) neurons with common eye preference form connected, intertwined patches, and (3) lateral connections primarily link regions of the same eye preference. Similar self-organization of cortical structures has been ob(cid:173) served experimentally in strabismic kittens. The model shows how pat(cid:173) terned lateral connections in the cortex may develop based on correlated activity and explains why lateral connection patterns follow receptive field properties such as ocular dominance.

Hebbian and competitive Hebbian algorithms are almost ubiquitous in modeling pattern formation in cortical development. We analyse in theoretical detail a particular model (adapted from Piepenbrock & Obermayer, 1999) for the development of Id stripe-like patterns, which places competitive and interactive cortical influences, and free and restricted initial arborisation onto a common footing. 1 Introduction Cats, many species of monkeys, and humans exibit ocular dominance stripes, which are alternating areas of primary visual cortex devoted to input from (the thalamic relay associated with) just one or the other eye (see Erwin et aI, 1995; Miller, 1996; Swindale, 1996 for reviews of theory and data). These well-known fingerprint patterns have been a seductive target for models of cortical pattern formation because of the mix of competition and cooperation they suggest. A wealth of synaptic adaptation algorithms has been suggested to account for them (and also the concomitant refinement of the topography of the map between the eyes and the cortex), many of which are based on forms of Hebbian learning. Critical issues for the models are the degree of correlation between inputs from the eyes, the nature of the initial arborisation of the axonal inputs, the degree and form of cortical competition, and the nature of synaptic saturation (preventing weights from changing sign or getting too large) and normalisation (allowing cortical and/or thalamic cells to support only a certain total synaptic weight).

Hebbian and competitive Hebbian algorithms are almost ubiquitous in modeling pattern formation in cortical development. We analyse in theoretical detail a particular model (adapted from Piepenbrock & Obermayer, 1999) for the development of Id stripe-like patterns, which places competitive and interactive cortical influences, and free and restricted initial arborisation onto a common footing. 1 Introduction Cats, many species of monkeys, and humans exibit ocular dominance stripes, which are alternating areas of primary visual cortex devoted to input from (the thalamic relay associated with) just one or the other eye (see Erwin et aI, 1995; Miller, 1996; Swindale, 1996 for reviews of theory and data). These well-known fingerprint patterns have been a seductive target for models of cortical pattern formation because of the mix of competition and cooperation they suggest. A wealth of synaptic adaptation algorithms has been suggested to account for them (and also the concomitant refinement of the topography of the map between the eyes and the cortex), many of which are based on forms of Hebbian learning. Critical issues for the models are the degree of correlation between inputs from the eyes, the nature of the initial arborisation of the axonal inputs, the degree and form of cortical competition, and the nature of synaptic saturation (preventing weights from changing sign or getting too large) and normalisation (allowing cortical and/or thalamic cells to support only a certain total synaptic weight).

Hebbian and competitive Hebbian algorithms are almost ubiquitous in modeling pattern formation in cortical development. We analyse in theoretical detaila particular model (adapted from Piepenbrock & Obermayer, 1999) for the development of Id stripe-like patterns, which places competitive and interactive cortical influences, and free and restricted initial arborisationonto a common footing. 1 Introduction Cats, many species of monkeys, and humans exibit ocular dominance stripes, which are alternating areas of primary visual cortex devoted to input from (the thalamic relay associated with)just one or the other eye (see Erwin et aI, 1995; Miller, 1996; Swindale, 1996 for reviews of theory and data). These well-known fingerprint patterns have been a seductive targetfor models of cortical pattern formation because of the mix of competition and cooperation they suggest. A wealth of synaptic adaptation algorithms has been suggested to account for them (and also the concomitant refinement of the topography of the map between the eyes and the cortex), many of which are based on forms of Hebbian learning. Critical issues for the models are the degree of correlation between inputs from the eyes, the nature of the initial arborisation of the axonal inputs, the degree and form of cortical competition, and the nature of synaptic saturation (preventing weights from changing sign or getting too large) and normalisation (allowing cortical and/or thalamic cells to support only a certain total synaptic weight).

In the analysis of data recorded by optical imaging from intrinsic signals (measurement of changes of light reflectance from cortical tissue) the removal of noise and artifacts such as blood vessel patterns is a serious problem. Often bandpass filtering is used, but the underlying assumption that a spatial frequency exists, which separates the mapping component from other components (especially the global signal), is questionable. Here we propose alternative ways of processing optical imaging data, using blind source separation techniques based on the spatial decorre1ation of the data. We first perform benchmarks on artificial data in order to select the way of processing, which is most robust with respect to sensor noise. We then apply it to recordings of optical imaging experiments from macaque primary visual cortex. We show that our BSS technique is able to extract ocular dominance and orientation preference maps from single condition stacks, for data, where standard post-processing procedures fail. Artifacts, especially blood vessel patterns, can often be completely removed from the maps. In summary, our method for blind source separation using extended spatial decorrelation is a superior technique for the analysis of optical recording data.

In the analysis of data recorded by optical imaging from intrinsic signals (measurement of changes of light reflectance from cortical tissue) the removal of noise and artifacts such as blood vessel patterns is a serious problem. Often bandpass filtering is used, but the underlying assumption that a spatial frequency exists, which separates the mapping component from other components (especially the global signal), is questionable. Here we propose alternative ways of processing optical imaging data, using blind source separation techniques based on the spatial decorre1ation of the data. We first perform benchmarks on artificial data in order to select the way of processing, which is most robust with respect to sensor noise. We then apply it to recordings of optical imaging experiments from macaque primary visual cortex. We show that our BSS technique is able to extract ocular dominance and orientation preference maps from single condition stacks, for data, where standard post-processing procedures fail. Artifacts, especially blood vessel patterns, can often be completely removed from the maps. In summary, our method for blind source separation using extended spatial decorrelation is a superior technique for the analysis of optical recording data.

In the analysis of data recorded by optical imaging from intrinsic signals of changes of light reflectance from cortical tissue) the removal(measurement of noise and artifacts such as blood vessel patterns is a serious problem. Often bandpass filtering is used, but the underlying assumption that a spatial frequency exists, which separates the mapping component from other components (especially the global signal), is questionable. Here we propose alternative ways of processing optical imaging data, using blind source separation techniques based on the spatial decorre1ation of the data. We first perform benchmarks on artificial data in order to select the way of processing, which is most robust with respect to sensor noise. We then apply it to recordings of optical imaging experiments BSS technique isfrom macaque primary visual cortex. We show that our able to extract ocular dominance and orientation preference maps from single condition stacks, for data, where standard post-processing procedures fail. Artifacts, especially blood vessel patterns, can often be completely removed from the maps. In summary, our method for blind source separation using extended spatial decorrelation is a superior technique for the analysis of optical recording data.

Lateral competition within a layer of neurons sharpens and localizes the response to an input stimulus. Here, we investigate a model for the activity dependent development of ocular dominance maps which allows to vary the degree of lateral competition. For weak competition, it resembles a correlation-based learning model and for strong competition, it becomes a self-organizing map. Thus, in the regime of weak competition the receptive fields are shaped by the second order statistics of the input patterns, whereas in the regime of strong competition, the higher moments and "features" of the individual patterns become important. When correlated localized stimuli from two eyes drive the cortical development we find (i) that a topographic map and binocular, localized receptive fields emerge when the degree of competition exceeds a critical value and (ii) that receptive fields exhibit eye dominance beyond a second critical value. For anti-correlated activity between the eyes, the second order statistics drive the system to develop ocular dominance even for weak competition, but no topography emerges. Topography is established only beyond a critical degree of competition.

Lateral competition within a layer of neurons sharpens and localizes the response to an input stimulus. Here, we investigate a model for the activity dependent development of ocular dominance maps which allows to vary the degree of lateral competition. For weak competition, it resembles a correlation-based learning model and for strong competition, it becomes a self-organizing map. Thus, in the regime of weak competition the receptive fields are shaped by the second order statistics of the input patterns, whereas in the regime of strong competition, the higher moments and "features" of the individual patterns become important. When correlated localized stimuli from two eyes drive the cortical development we find (i) that a topographic map and binocular, localized receptive fields emerge when the degree of competition exceeds a critical value and (ii) that receptive fields exhibit eye dominance beyond a second critical value. For anti-correlated activity between the eyes, the second order statistics drive the system to develop ocular dominance even for weak competition, but no topography emerges. Topography is established only beyond a critical degree of competition.